Pakistan’s Defence Minister Khawaja Asif has issued a stern warning that Islamabad may undertake military operations within Afghan territory following a significant increase in cross-border terrorist incidents.
During his appearance on a private television network, the Defence Minister articulated growing concerns regarding Afghanistan’s role in facilitating militant activities. He emphasized that Pakistan would not tolerate the escalating terrorism emanating from Afghan soil and stressed that decisive action would follow if terrorist sanctuaries persist.
Taliban’s Response Deemed Insufficient
Asif criticized the Taliban administration’s handling of terrorist hideouts within Afghanistan, stating that mere verbal condemnations and expressions of regret prove inadequate. According to the minister, concrete measures are necessary to demonstrate genuine commitment to eliminating militant infrastructure.
The Defence Minister revealed that intelligence assessments indicate most perpetrators of recent attacks hold Afghan nationality, categorically denying the existence of terrorist bases within Pakistani territory.
Wana Cadet College Operation Success
Referencing the recent security incident at Wana Cadet College, Asif commended the military’s successful rescue operation that ensured all cadets’ safety during the crisis.
India’s Alleged Role in Regional Instability
The minister accused India of exploiting Afghanistan as a conduit for hostile activities against Pakistan, asserting that New Delhi’s antagonistic intentions have become undeniable. He reaffirmed Pakistan’s heightened vigilance regarding Indian movements and readiness to counter any aggressive initiatives.
Regional Security Implications
Pakistan’s potential military intervention in Afghanistan signals deteriorating bilateral relations and raises concerns about regional stability. The country maintains maximum alert status while continuously evaluating threats from multiple fronts.
The Defence Minister’s statements reflect Pakistan’s mounting frustration with cross-border terrorism and underscore the possibility of unilateral action should diplomatic channels fail to yield results in addressing militant sanctuaries across the border.
